Economies are experiencing the development of brand-new thoughts around CBDCs, stablecoins or personal digital currencies.

What’s interesting is that the term”blockchain” isn’t used once in that white paper. The objective of the paper was to propose a solution to the central issue of double-spending a digital money, which is the representation of a move of value directly between transacting parties, without using a fundamental reputable third party.

Stocks by definition are a medium of exchange for products and services, a unit of consideration, as well as stores of value. Money, in its conventional sense, meets all of these three components.

Central bank digital money
China has definitely emerged as a leader in its own development of CBDCs, having recently proposed there are a global set of rules that addresses issues such as interoperability between authorities.

Central to any federal monetary policy and financial stability is that the public’s trust in central banks, and its trust that money provided by the central bank meets those three key elements of a money — whether it is issued in physical or digital form. A central bank electronic money isn’t a stablecoin nor can it be an electronic advantage but rather a digital representation of money — i.e., that a digital pound today is well worth the same tomorrow and its buying power (what its holder could buy) doesn’t change beyond certain thresholds.

The European Central Bank’s suggestion for a digital euro is built upon the assumption of complementing the current cash and wholesale central bank deposit system in place. It’s regarded as a way of ensuring that European taxpayers are provided with access to a secure type of cash within an fast-changing digital world, while actively promoting innovation in the area of retail payments, supporting society vulnerable and reducing their potential financial exclusion. A digital euro can be regarded as an option for the reduction of the general price and environmental footprint of the current monetary and payments system.

With markets currently experiencing the growth of notions around central bank difficulties, stablecoins or private electronic currencies, the experience has been roughly the same as with preceding financial innovations: coins, banknotes, checks and charge cards. Many see blockchain and dispersed ledger technology, or DLT, since the mechanism to replace electronic currency in conventional bank accounts. As paper cash succeeded silver and gold, digital transfers can replace paper money.

The Growth of digital currencies

The current COVID-19 pandemic purchased inspiration for cashless transactions and changed the way society interacts financially, which has accelerated the concept of digital monies in people’s heads. With fewer cash transactions taking place, consumers and businesses are more conscious of the attributes and advantages of digital currencies.

Already, central banks engage with additional qualifying financial institutions, most frequently clearing banks, through the usage of electronic central bank deposits. Alongside this system, they also issue banknotes and coins to the general public. A shift to digital versions of these coins and notes is a natural progression in our more digitized world.

But this trend could cause an unintended effect: Within a cashless society, in which the public no longer has access to a state-guaranteed system of payment, the private industry would control access to, growth of pricing for alternative payment methods. Unless, that is, governments issue digital currencies to the public through their various central banks. But in a system where central banks could have a direct connection with every individual, there could be major disruption in the commercial banking market, including the issues of important data holding and associated data privacy. Would citizens need the central bank to know about every transaction they’ve made?

To ease any CBDC, the technology platform must fulfill certain key attributes:

Convenience: The penetration of smartphones in contemporary society allows for a”tap-to-pay” platform that is well understood or to get a QR code-based system.
Security and endurance : Present mature cryptographic techniques provide users with data security; either software- or hardware-based solitude enforcement. The durability of a 24/7/365 infrastructure is critical to a CBDC’s performance. Current centralized card networks reveal that very high transaction capacities are possible. Permissioned DLT networks may be equal substitutes for conventional technologies. Frequent data standards will also play a role in interoperability.
With the example of Bitcoin (BTC), the blockchain infrastructure provides a totally decentralized, fully permissionless public network that, theoretically, no-one person, entity or jurisdiction has control over. In the same manner, blockchain and/or DLTs can provide a similar system to support the problem of CBDCs one of a national population.

On the other hand, the popular framework for electronic monies is a concentrated, permissioned system that offers the issuing authority, which is typically the federal central bank, with a degree of control and increased supervision of the”blockchain” that records the electronic currency trades. That centralized permissioned dispersed ledger could address these vital attributes.

For many commentators, the ability of central banks to issue programmable CBDCs to a centralized permissioned blockchain is a good development — for instance, controlling and defining the uses of their electronic money issued so that it can only be used for meals, not alcohol, cigarettes or gambling. There are also transparency advantages that allow authorities to act upon tax evasion and other criminal actions, by way of access into the underlying data that is unstructured.

The original motive for Satoshi’s white paper was to establish a protocol that allowed for the electronic exchange of significance, peer-to-peer without the dependence or requirement to go through a central authority.

It is ironic that the benefits that Satoshi explained because white paper are now being considered by central banks as they research and consider how the technology could underpin fresh digitally issued currency. Both theories have come into everyday conversation almost concurrently, making it look as though they are interwoven.

Soramitsu, a fintech firm delivering blockchain based solutions to companies and governments — that is now an associate of the agency’s accelerator program — recently announced its partnership with the National Bank of Cambodia to establish a secure, standardized electronic currency alternative to paper bank notes onto a single payment platform. The Bakong system is built upon the Hyperledger Iroha DLT, integrated with the traditional banking system, and providing users with easy access via ID file scan, photograph check and biometric detection. Having such international experience provides the island with important insight into any possible future implementation of digital currencies.

There are, of course, several technical, economical, fiscal and legal problems, including the impact of a digital money on financial policy, financial stability and banks’ business models, that are regrettably beyond the constraints of the article.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here